Peer Review Process
JIKSI: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Sistem Informasi follows a strict and transparent review process to ensure the quality and credibility of published articles. The journal applies a double-blind peer-review system in which the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential.
Submission and Initial Evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to JIKSI undergo an initial screening by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal scope and author guidelines.
Manuscripts that pass this stage will be assigned an identification number for further processing.
Peer Review
Each eligible manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
Reviewers are selected based on their academic background, experience, and research contributions.
If necessary, additional reviewers may be assigned.
Double-Blind Review
JIKSI applies a double-blind review process where the identities of authors and reviewers are not disclosed to each other.
This ensures fairness, objectivity, and minimizes bias.
Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
- Scientific quality
- Originality
- Relevance to journal scope
- Clarity of presentation
- Ethical compliance
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback.
Review Duration
JIKSI is committed to an efficient review process.
Reviewers are generally given about one month per review round.
Decision and Revision
After review, the editor evaluates reviewer comments.
Possible decisions:
- Accepted
- Minor revision
- Major revision
- Rejected
Authors must revise the manuscript according to reviewer comments within the given time.
Editorial Decision
Final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or Editorial Board.
Decision is based on:
- Reviewer recommendations
- Originality
- Scope relevance
- Ethical standards
Confidentiality
JIKSI maintains strict confidentiality.
Reviewers must not share manuscript information with others.
Review Process Improvement
JIKSI continuously improves the review process.
Suggestions from authors and reviewers are welcome.
Contact
For questions regarding review process: